First, my disclaimer: I am not a Bible scholar; just an average guy (who is probably a little bit OCD about his Bibles). And, this is my first attempt at reviewing anything since I was a journalism major at the University of Alaska 16 years ago. Also, as I’ve written it, I think I’ve strayed a bit from my original goal of providing a classic review. So, please bear with me.
Next, a
perspective on my philosophy of Bible use:
I generally have a translation that I use exclusively, depending on what
I am looking to get out of my Bible reading at any particular time. If I’m looking for apologetics, I read the
RSV-2nd Catholic Edition; for devotional reading, I use the Douay;
for inspirational-Knox, my study Bible is the original Jerusalem Bible, and my
portable is a small Confraternity with psalms from the New Latin Psalter (I
consider it my second choice for pretty much any of the uses above, except it
doesn’t have the depth of commentary of the JB for study, but hey, it fits in
my briefcase nicely…). The one “hole” in
my Bible shelf is the one that is used for religious education in our parishes;
a New American Bible-Revised Edition. I
know my kids will eventually get one of their own, and I’ll want to be able to
help them as they go through classes (and, if I’m needed as a sub for the
program).
I’ve got the NABRE on a couple
different apps on my iPhone, but wanted to go with a paper copy. Getting feedback from various places like the
Catholic Answers forums and Tim’s blog, I had two decisions to make: whether to
get a regular print or a study version, and then, which one. After some soul-searching, I decided to go
with a study Bible, as I hoped the extra commentary would offset some of the
concerning footnotes. And, others have
described the footnotes as faith-challenging, which isn’t always a bad thing –
some things like faith need to be tried by fire once in awhile. I was able to check out a couple different
editions through my library, but the one I wasn’t able to test drive was the
Little Rock Study Bible. Well, I was
able to get a copy from Tim, and he asked me if I would write a review (subject
to my disclaimers above), and I told him I’d be happy to.
So, first, from my experience with
the older NAB translations, as well as what I’ve read on my apps, I’m not the
biggest fan of the NAB(RE). I’m one of
those who is suspicious of the notes – I understand where they’re coming from
and that they don’t cross the boundaries of orthodoxy, but I definitely
understand (and agree) with their detractors that they’re not good for the
average user. I was seeking a NABRE
under some protest from myself – I wanted to get it not because I genuinely
wanted to get one, but because I feel I had to have one.
So, the Little Rock has been here a
couple weeks, and I’ve discovered something very odd; I actually WANT to read
it. It’s not for the translation itself,
and certainly not the footnotes, but the additional study materials included in
the Little Rock far made up any deficiency in the text. I love having the little extras right on the
page with the text they refer to, and the format is wonderful (best layout of
any Bible I have, period-I like it better than the Harper NABRE I tried, and
that was also superior compared to the other boring NAB layouts I’ve seen). Having the cross references in side columns
and the footnotes on the bottom draws the eye naturally to what you’re looking
for; rather than having to hunt a little bit.
I dare say it’s like the Jerusalem Bible, but with a fresh and modern
layout. It doesn’t have quite the depth
of commentary that the JB does, but the extra inserts are relevant and offer
nice insights into the characters, places, and cultures. I also do like the prayer starters scattered
throughout the text; when I get to one while reading, I do take a minute or two
of contemplation on them. The notes that
compare Catholic and Protestant views on justification and the end times were
good at getting the points of comparison and promote the Catholic view,
although I would have rather had a bit more depth.
I know Tim and others have reviewed
the Little Rock Study Bible on this blog, and generally I agree with what
they’ve previously said. I know a while
back Tim had an article on what was more important; translation or
edition. And, when I read it, I wasn’t
convinced that edition was more important than translation. Well, after spending a few weeks with the
Little Rock, I now understand what he was trying to get at, and I’ve come to
agree.
1 comment:
Nobody is going to be led astray by the NABRE (other than the usual commentary on the notes and the over the top Historical Critical intros). But you can't ever develop a like for it ala Knox or a respect for it ala RSV-CE or an awe for it ala original JB notes. Unfortunately I have developed a major league active dislike of Little Rock based on their study of 1 and 2 Sam which I did some years ago. - Peter Brennan
Post a Comment