Showing posts with label guest post. Show all posts
Showing posts with label guest post. Show all posts

Thursday, April 5, 2018

NT Textual Basis Question to Consider

Looking ahead to more information about the Revised New Jerusalem Bible many readers are curious about the base texts used. If it uses the Nestle Aland 28th edition of the Greek New Testament (NA28), it would be the first Catholic translation to do so. (Note: In her recent responses to reader questions, the USCCB's Mary Sperry indicated that the NABRE NT revision team is working from NA28, but that text won't be ready for several more years. We can assume that the SPL's planned revision to the NRSVwill likewise be based on NA28 for the New Testament).

Currently the only major Bible translation to base the NT on NA28 is the new Christian Standard Bible (CSB), the successor to the Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB). This is important, because unlike the past several incremental revisions, for the NA28 "In the Catholic Epistles, the text has been edited in line with the Editio Critica Maior and its use of the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (CBGM). The result is a change in just over 30 places." 

Arguably that's the most concentrated set of changes introduced to the main text of the Greek NT since the 26th edition in 1979. That's when roughly 700 differences made their way by scholarly consensus out of the margins and into the main text of the New Testament. And this time, they're all concentrated in the Catholic Epistles.

SInce the Catholic epistles contain many of the books in the NT that have often proven problematic for Reformation Protestants - even to the point of being disputed - I'd love to know more about what those 30 changes mean for future translations.

Are there any Greek New Testament scholars who could survey the 30 changes in the Catholic Epistles of NA28, and help readers understand them? Ideally, we might compare how those changes played out in a Protestant translation (the CSB) and a Catholic one (presumably the RNJB).

Any takers?

Thanks to Chris for submitting this question for consideration.

Monday, March 26, 2018

Guest Post: From Eugene P to the CEB

 Pocket-Zippered Eco-Leather CEB with my rosary by
artisan 
FloraYoonJewelry in Seoul, S.Korea via Etsy
Thank you to my friend Owen for providing this reflective post about his journey to the CEB.  The origins of this post go back to a recent post I did on the CEB Study Bible.  

Inserting myself into the conversation with David and Timothy, (and what I am going to say is all old news for Tim as we've chatted loads) I am also very much in the space you mention, David, regarding both the Common English Bible and your approach in purpose with the bible. 

Your list for going forward/looking back later in life is spot on. I'm a few years off 60, well away from the 80 years old you mention looking forward-to/back-from but, time is moving faster even at my age and I can say with certainty that the things you mention as important are those that matter most and yes, few of the other things we may have once imagined as so vital to the Christian are of little important.

Per translations, variations, paraphrases et cetera and each in their many editions and iterations; I've read all the major ones both sides of the Tiber. I've read and studied them as a lay person, as an ordained minister, as a clergy-convert to Catholicism, as a ''once-again-theology-student'' in a formal setting, and finally as returned to "just" a lay person.  

For all the study and comparisons both in hallowed-halls and as lived-experience I am in a place where I seek to expend precious energy actually living the Word, to the best of my ability, enabled by grace overendless mop-head (a term of semi-endearment) styled pouring over minutia, nit picking and parsing, proof-texting and proving who is right or most right. God bless them for whom that is a helpful thing. Really, God bless'em good. If any of that equates with being a better disciple of Christ, a better fellow human, please have at it. It is no longer me if it ever really was me. Not a few of my comments in the archive of this blog I would presently find embarrassing were I to look them up - nothing bad per se, just wow, did I once think that way? I did.

In the late 90s, then as a Protestant minister, I was introduced to Eugene Peterson [EP] (regrettably not in person) and to his then portions of the bible as they were rolled out. It was beyond refreshing. Then in 2002 I bought my first complete The Message Bible [MSG]. Bam. Wow. Alive. Real poetry. Talk about your read-think-pray-live!

However, I was in circles where for many the MSG was in disfavour and in as much taken up with "the fear of man"---that people pleasing monster borne of valuing myself via the eyes of others rather than investing in enough silence to hear my own voice, an inner wisdom as well as to truly trust God in that inner voice---because of nonsense like that, I put that wonderful MSG bible away.

Still later, having taken the deep-dive risk of losing my livelihood in order to enter the Roman Catholic Church, I strove and I do mean strove to be whatever I thought others said was the best way to be Catholic. It was a genuine conversion quickly coloured by the expectations and opinions of others. In some respects I had merely changed silos and in regard to bible translations specifically I found the "dialogue" over right and wrong, good and bad, worthy and dross to be far more vitriolic. And once again I found EP and his MSG held in question by those whom I sought to emulate in the name of being a good Catholic. Sad, I know.

Later on still, with much personal work done and say, with accepted vocational changes, I happened on news of the release of The Message Catholic/Ecumenical [MSGCE] (I blame ;-) Tim and his blog for that news) and I picked up a copy and wondered why-the-blank I had let go of the MSG in those intervening years. Well, I knew why, as I've just said, it as more that I in letting go the nonsense I was amazed to have re-discovered such a helpful bible.

Personal growth, becoming more genuinely open, seeking God again in my own terms and with false affections fading, the timing was right. The MSG was a bible-balm.

Last year during Lent I decided one of the things I would "give up" was the endless bible translation version and edition comparison. The beginning of the end of premium and of perfect bible was at hand. I immersed myself into just one bible, reading only that one the whole of Lent. I chose the MSGCE. It was transformative. So much so that Lent ended and I continued on in the Message-only or very nearly only. Was I worried that it was a paraphrase? No. I have decades of formal and informal training behind me and I got loads of approved-translation NRSV in our Canadian liturgy and not unimportantly I was coming to a more deeply holistic understanding of being Catholic. That change has been, I pray, irreversible; what’s been seen cannot be unseen and never more did that old hymn resonate, “no turning back”.

Reading-thinking-praying-living the MSG was the best bible-experience I'd had to date with most genuine impact in my life; that’s 37 years of bible, reading, praying, preaching, teaching, attempts at living fully.

Unsurprisingly, I had no desire to move away from EP's MSGCE. I was invited to twice give a continuous-live-no-breaks-reading of the Gospel of Mark from the MSGCE in our parish. It was very favourably received.

So, right, I had no interest in getting another bible, another translation. Then, serendipity happened and along came the Common English Bible. Like this: I was listening to a recent podcast of a sermon by a local former-denominational-peer-minister acquaintance of mine as I was interested in the inner-city work his folks are engaged in and, what was that? That was the sound of a familiar passage in a translation I could identify and, as noted, I know pretty much all of them, pretty well. I replayed the portion of the podcast and wrote the words down, then plugged them into Google Search and ta-da!, there those words were on biblegateway.com as some bible version I did not know at all. I read on, then on and on and then went looking for a good used copy on-line.

I did not think anything would move me from the MSGCE as my primary bible. But the CEB has done so (sorrEy, Tim!). Granted, the MSG is the only bible that has made me laugh out loud or hoot with enjoyment/surprise and I do still love it so. Meanwhile, the CEB has become my bible of prayer, of daily reading and reflection and when I choose so, of study. It is quickly becoming the one that comes to mind during the day in relation to this or that happening or thought. So yes, my primary translation is the CEB with the MSG as a beloved companion. 

It's like the CEB found me rather than the other way round. (As an aside, EP himself discourages one from reading his MSG as ones primary bible.)

Per the CEB:
- I appreciate its scholarship which is up to date and while no translation is wholly unaffected this one resonates.
- I appreciate its broad ecumenical translator base (more Catholics than the now Catholic-lauded ESV et.al except perhaps the originally all-Catholic JB-family (?) ) and the inclusion of a greater proportion of woman in that mix (indeed, one third among the Catholics ).
- I appreciate that it is a wholly new translation, not a redo or a redo of a redo despite the claims of late of publishers of many a translation I need not name for readers of this blog.
- I highly value a number of perhaps at first jarring translation choices it makes. One reflection and with the publishers intentions considered these choices ring true and are refreshing as Christianity grows. (Yes, I am purposefully choosing to not note those citations because, as noted above, I'm no longer interested in debate and any reader here can or has found plenteous opinion expounding posts elsewhere.)
- I appreciate the CEB's conversational tone without its becoming colloquial and without the loss including classic-Judeo-Christian-historic connections and terms (a thing the good EP often avoids in the MSG. I understand his reasoning and have missed those helpful connections so for me, here is another plus in the CEB). 
- I value the CEBs non-sectarian tone both in the translation itself and in the notes of the Study edition.

It's readiness to make certain bold yet informed choices while still incorporating classic Christian-theological terms all in a manner that is eminently readable and listen-able is, I think, remarkable.

It surprised me how quickly I made the choice to read the CEB as primary (now, CEB plural as I confess have the hardback study with full Catholic and Eastern church "apocryphal" books and the pocket-zipper, though Protestant canon only). Tim jokingly predicted that outcome. Haven't bothered myself with comparing the CEB 2011 with later iterations. Was tempted to pine as of old once I knew there were those changes and even wrote the publisher to inquire after a comparison list but then ended up just as happy to have received no reply because for me, why loose the gained-ground of embracing a read-to-live what is to hand approach (I mean, really, how far off can the changes and corrections be)?  As it now turns out (see comments in the originating post) both editions I have are the most recent iterations of the translation). Good enough, very-good enough.

Once upon a time, a long, long time, I wanted the right bible, the right perfect bible, the right perfect premium bible. To use words such as obsession and addiction in that context are not a stretch. And now?

Read-to-really-live. That's how I see it. If that's this or that translation for you (the 'royal you' here :) ) please, please read-think-pray and live fully. Please, just go live it. But wait, is this or that translation officially approved? Please do read Second Vatican Council, Dei Verbum. 

Well, didn't this comment become that post!

Thus endeth the Lesson. Or, perhaps, so Life begins.

Monday, March 12, 2018

First Look: NOAB 5th Edition (NRSV w/Apocrypha)

Thanks to Marc for providing these pictures of the New Oxford Annotated Bible with Apocrypha.  He reports that he pre-ordered it during the holiday sale in December. The stated release date is April 1st for this edition, but apparently Oxford is shipping pre-orders early! Overall, the construction and type setting of this edition is nearly identical to the fourth edition. I've included a few side by side photos for reference (fourth edition on the left, fifth edition on the right). The text columns continue to be left-justified, and the font of the Bible text and notes remains the same. Physically, the fifth edition is no thicker than the fourth. In fact, it feels a little thinner. This is probably because the pages in my fourth edition have "expanded" with use.  It is printed in the Netherlands by Royal Jongbloed.

Marc is happy to answer any of your questions in the comments.  I really liked the feel and construction of the 4th edition, which was done by Royal Jongbloed as well.  

New to this Edition:
-Twenty new essays and introductions, including new essays on Time/Calendar and Languages of the Bible
-Fully revised and updated annotations to reflect the latest biblical scholarship
-Introductions and extensive annotations for each biblical book
-Informative essays on essential topics for biblical study
-Color maps, timelines, glossary, and an index to study materials
-Includes the Apocrypha

-Thumb-indexed













Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Guest Post: NABRE vs. NRSV vs Neither (Part II)

We now move on to part II of this series initated by guest blogger Dominic.  He wants to open it up to those of you who have a different favorite translation, while also referencing the NABRE and NRSV.  This is part II in a multe-part series.

Part 2 allows for dissent of one or both of the aforementioned transitions. Also, you now have an opportunity to speak more on your favorite translation if it’s neither. Please follow the guidelines.

Ground Rules:
1) State your favorite translation

2) Even if you do not like either, please give pros and cons to both in a charitable and respectful way. You can express dislike without being “ugly.”

3) Why is your choice of translation preferable? Please be detailed. 

4) If you chose “neither” then which translation do you still think is better between the two (NRSV vs. Nabre) even if you don’t like either and why. 

5) If you are critical, please do it in a respectful and understanding way. It’s easy to get “ugly” behind a keyboard but don’t lose track of the decor you would show if you were face to face with those you disagree.

Once again, your comments will only be posted if you fill out all five parts.  You are encouraged to cite any references if possible.  

Friday, November 17, 2017

Guest Post: NABRE vs. NRSV (Part I)

This is meant to be more of a participatory guest post by Dominic, who wants to know your thoughts comparing the NABRE and NRSV bibles.  He has listed some ground rules for this, which I encourage you to read before commenting.  Dominic has been going over both translations for years now, and is interested in hearing what you all think.  This is the first in a multi-part series.

Here are the ground rules:


1) Must have an appreciation for both translations and you must state that. 

2) State your favorite Bible Translation (doesn’t have to be the NRSV or NABRE)

3) Pros and cons of each translation

4) No other translation may be introduced other than only naming your favorite translation. 

5) Which Translation do you prefer between the two, and why?

At minimum, you must follow the five points or your comments will not be posted.  If at all possible,  post links to articles or essays about said translations and translation philosophies that may be read for further reflection for both series.

Friday, June 30, 2017

Part II: The NAB v. The Lectionary

Thanks to Robert for this extensive guest post. You can read part one here.

Twelfth Sunday of Ordinary Time 
In the last episode (covering the weekday mass for the feast of St. Mark the Evangelist), we saw that the 1970/1986 NAB matches nearly perfectly with the lectionary readings, whereas the ICEL translations of the antiphons and alleluia verse are quite free and different from any full bible translation.
Today we will look at a Sunday mass with all the bells and whistles and second readings. Differences between texts will be bolded. In curious expectation for the change in lectionary text in 8-10 years, NABRE Old Testament renderings are included for the curious, as well as pertinent chunks of the Revised Grail Psalms, which are already in use and some places and may (or may not) become the normative psalms for the liturgy of the American Church in the coming years. I encourage you to compare what is there to your translation of choice and charitably highlight some salient differences.  Insights on the source languages would be quite welcome, as I do not pretend to have any understanding of Hebrew and Greek. Many thanks again to Timothy for running this labor of love and putting up with our bickering in the comment section.

Entrance Antiphon
Cf. Psalm 28: 8-9

Lectionary (ICEL translation):
The Lord is the strength of his people,
A saving refuge for the one he has anointed.
Save your people, Lord, and bless your heritage,
And govern them for ever.

NAB 1970/1986:
The Lord is the strength of his people,
the saving refuge of his anointed.
Save your people, and bless your inheritance;
feed them, and carry them forever.

(For contrast)
NABRE psalter:
Lord, you are a strength for your people,
the saving refuge of your anointed.
Save your people, bless your inheritance;
pasture and carry them forever.

Revised Grail Psalter:
The LORD is the strength of his people,
a saving refuge for his anointed.
Save your people and bless your heritage.
Shepherd and carry them forever.

These antiphons are adaptations rather than translations of the text from which they are drawn, which can be seen in the Ps 28:9b.  Neither the ICEL antiphon nor the original NAB psalter contain the shepherd imagery which is, to me, the lasting image of the NABRE and Revised Grail Psalter rendition of this chunk.  The verb “to pasture” that is found in the NABRE psalter here is especially vivid to me.  The work of a shepherd is fairly abstract to a first world city dweller like me, but the image of God taking us to a place of safety in which we may flourish is a strong one.  I am at times numb to the shepherd/sheepfold images and scripture, but in times of great need I find it a source of great comfort.  I feel a desire to make the bible “strange” again—to break out of my preconceived notions and accept its challenges and consolations on their own terms.  Even as I type this, being reminded of that metaphor is enough to fill my heart with great peace.  What a gift the lectionary is!

First Reading
Jeremiah 20:10-13

Lectionary:
Jeremiah said:
“I hear the whisperings of many:
‘Terror on every side!
Denounce! let us denounce him!’
All those who were my friends
are on the watch for any misstep of mine.
‘Perhaps he will be trapped; then we can prevail,
and take our vengeance on him.’
But the Lord is with me, like a mighty champion:
my persecutors will stumble, they will not triumph.
In their failure they will be put to utter shame,
to lasting, unforgettable confusion.
O Lord of hosts, you who test the just,
who probe mind and heart,
let me witness the vengeance you take on them,
for to you I have entrusted my cause.
Sing to the Lord,
praise the Lord,
for he has rescued the life of the poor
from the power of the wicked!”

NAB 1970/1986:
Yes, I hear the whisperings of many:
“Terror on every side!
Denounce! Let us denounce him!”
All those who were my friends
are on the watch for any misstep of mine.
“Perhaps he will be trapped; then we can prevail,
and take our vengeance on him.”
But the Lord is with me, like a mighty champion:
my persecutors will stumble, they will not triumph.
In their failure they will be put to utter shame,
to lasting, unforgettable confusion.
O Lord of hosts, you who test the just,
who probe mind and heart,
Let me witness the vengeance you take on them,
for to you I have entrusted my cause.
Sing to the Lord,
praise the Lord,
For he has rescued the life of the poor
from the power of the wicked!

NABRE:
Yes, I hear the whisperings of many:
“Terror on every side!
Denounce! Let us denounce him!”
All those who were my friends
are on the watch for any misstep of mine.
“Perhaps he can be tricked; then we will prevail,
and take our revenge on him.”
But the Lord is with me, like a mighty champion:
my persecutors will stumble, they will not prevail.
In their failure they will be put to utter shame,
to lasting, unforgettable confusion.
Lord of hosts, you test the just,
you see mind and heart,
Let me see the vengeance you take on them,
for to you I have entrusted my cause.
Sing to the Lord,
praise the Lord,
For he has rescued the life of the poor
from the power of the evildoers!

Hearing from the confessions of Jeremiah is always a treat for this solipsistic young Catholic who is aware of the difficulties and not just the joys of having joined the Church.  This part of Jeremiah 20 is bookended by two of the most brutally honest complaints of suffering in the whole of scripture.  We at mass get only the section of consolation here.  The 1970/1986 NAB is near exactly the same as the lectionary in this case.  The comparison between the 1970/1986 NAB and the NABRE seems especially interesting to me, though.  There is an assumption that the NABRE is more literal and very different from the previous NAB, and while that is true, at times the text is very much the same, as is the case here.  It is a good reminder to us that “more literal” does not always mean we should expect “bible English”.  The marketing of the KJV family of translations (including the good ole RSV-CE and RSV-2CE) has given that idea to even NAB lovers like me, but it isn’t necessarily true.  Someone with knowledge of Hebrew will need to speak to this, but it seems to me that the NABRE has retreated from some words in this passage that seem very scripture-y—vengeance, triumph, probe, wicked—and revealed some parallelisms: the repetition of the word “prevail”, Jeremiah “seeing” his own vindication just as God “sees” into the human heart and mind.  The NABRE Old Testament seems much more vigorous translation than its predecessor, but that certainly doesn’t always mean they are cribbing words from the King James Bible vocabulary.

Responsorial Psalm
Psalm 69:8-10, 14, 17, 33-35

Lectionary:
R: Lord, in your great love, answer me.

For your sake I bear insult,
And shame covers my face.
I have become an outcast to my brothers,
A stranger to my children,
Because zeal for your house consumes me,
And the insults of those who blaspheme you fall upon me

I pray to you, O Lord,
For the time of your favor, O God!
In your great kindness answer me
With your constant help.
Answer me, O Lord, for bounteous is your kindness;
In your great mercy turn toward me.

“See, you lowly ones, and be glad;
You who seek God, may your hearts revive!
For the Lord hears the poor,
And his own who are in bonds he spurns not.
Let the heavens and the earth praise him,
The seas and whatever moves in them!”

1970 NAB Psalter:

Since for your sake I bear insult,
And shame covers my face.
I have become an outcast to my brothers,
A stranger to my mother’s sons,
Because zeal for your house consumes me,
And the insults of those who blaspheme you fall upon me.

But I pray to you, O Lord,
For the time of your favor, O God!
In your great kindness answer me
with your constant help.
Answer me, O Lord, for bounteous is your kindness;
In your great mercy turn toward me.

“See you lowly ones, and be glad;
You who seek God, may your hearts be merry
For the Lord hears the poor,
And his own who are in bonds he spurns not.
Let the heavens and the earth praise him,
The seas and whatever moves in them!”

NABRE Psalter:
For it is on your account I bear insult,
That disgrace covers my face.
I have become an outcast to my kindred,
A stranger to my mother’s children.
Because zeal for your house has consumed me,
I am scorned by those who scorn you.

But I will pray to you, Lord, at a favorable time.
God, in your abundant kindness, answer me
With your sure deliverance.
Answer me, Lord, in your generous love;
In your great mercy turn to me.

“See, you lowly ones, and be glad;
You who seek God, take heart!
For the Lord hears the poor,
And does not spurn those in bondage.
Let the heaven and the earth praise him,
The seas and whatever moves in them.

Revised Grail Psalter:
It is for you that I suffer taunts,
that shame has covered my face.
To my own kin I have become an outcast,
a stranger to the children of my mother.
Zeal for your house consumes me,
and taunts against you fall on me.

But I pray to you, O LORD,
for a time of your favor.
In your great mercy, answer me, O God,
with your salvation that never fails.
LORD, answer, for your mercy is kind;
in your great compassion, turn towards me.

The poor when they see it will be glad,
and God-seeking hearts will revive;
for the LORD listens to the needy,
and does not spurn his own in their chains.
Let the heavens and the earth give him praise,
the seas and everything that moves in them.



The original NAB psalter and the lectionary psalm are very close, with instructive differences.  The lectionary lops off some of the connecting tissue which links parts of the bible to their surrounding context.  This is, of course, a necessity for streamlined oral proclamation of parts of the bible.  You can see this in the many places where the NAB text is transferred without change to the lectionary except for a missing word like “but”, “therefore”, or “yet” at the beginning of the passage.

The differences between the NABRE psalter and the Revised Grail Psalms are fascinating to me, as they were the last time I compared the NAB to the lectionary.  Once again, the NABRE seems to retain some of the rough edges and otherness of the world of the psalms while the Revised Grail version is buffed clean and ready to be used in prayer by a 21
st century American.  The Revised Grail rendition of this psalm hits me in all the right places: lacking the word “whatever” in the last line (which as a 30 year old who grew up in the 1990s still smacks of dismissiveness to me), the smoother English style as in phrases like “taunts against you fall on me” and “does not spurn his own in their chains”, as well as the vocabulary of “mercy”, “compassion”, and “salvation.”  The psalms are songs and prayers.  This version seems most to be the one I would sing and pray.   I strongly suspect, though, that of the related renditions we see here it is the least like the psalm and prayer of the ancient Israelite whose inspired words bless us today.


Second Reading

Romans 5:12-15

Lectionary:
Brothers and sisters: Through one man sin entered the world, and through sin, death, and thus death came to all men, inasmuch as all sinned—for up to the time of the law, sin was in the world, though sin is not accounted when there is no law.  But death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who did not sin after the pattern of the trespass of Adam, who is the type of the one who was to come.
But the gift is not like the transgression.  For if by the transgression of the one the many died, how much more did the grace of God and the gracious gift of the one man Jesus Christ overflow for the many.

1970/1986 NAB (which is currently the up-to-date New Testament):

Therefore, just as through one person sin entered the world, and through sin, death, and thus death came to all, inasmuch as all sinned—for up to the time of the law, sin was in the world, though sin is not accounted when there is no law.  But death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who did not sin after the pattern of the trespass of Adam, who is the type of the one who was to come.
But the gift is not like the transgression.  For if by that one person’s transgression the many died, how much more did the grace of God and the gracious gift of the one person Jesus Christ overflow for the many.

Here is an interesting case of the light gender neutrality of the 1986 Revised New Testament of the NAB, which was carried through to the whole text with the advent of the NABRE. You don’t need
me to tell you that this is a third rail among the folks who hold opinions on bible translation.  I’m of the opinion that “one man” sounds more poetic and more biblical (whatever that means) than “one person”, but that this is simply due to force of habit.  It sounds like the bible because that’s what bibles have sounded like, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it is the only or even the proper understanding of the text.  No matter what you think of the translation wars of the last 30 years, it is plain to see that what is important here is Adam and Jesus’ shared personhood, not their common male-ness.  As I’ve read both aloud in preparing this article, I actually think the NAB version is a bit clearer, as having two uses of the word “the” in such close proximity in the phrase “if by the transgression of the one the many died” seems clumsy.  Paul’s arguments and sentences are knotted as it is—to further pretzel them in the interest of removing the word “person” seems a bit perverse, especially in light of the great need for us Catholics to understand St. Paul’s writings.  They are widely ignored in preaching.  Perhaps being beaten over the head with them the first 500 years of Protestantism has made us collectively shy away from Paul’s epistles, but the Church Fathers were no strangers to Paul and I’m only now realizing that I shouldn’t be either.  I am part of an informal group of folks about my age that meet biweekly to discuss the next day’s Sunday readings.  When we discussed this reading it was plain to us who poorly we understood what Paul was trying to tell the first century Roman church, never mind what he was trying to tell us!  Especially opaque to me is his point that the Law in some way causes sin.  The New Collegeville Commentary on Galatians and Romans has been a great help to me in this way the past few days.  If you have a good resource on Paul, feel free to comment with a suggestion!

Alleluia Verse
John 15:26b, 27a

Lectionary (ICEL translation):

The Spirit of truth will testify to me, says the Lord; and you also will testify.

1970/1986 NAB:

…the Spirit of truth that proceeds from the Father, he will testify to me.  And you also testify…

Not much to see here.  The ICEL version is an adaptation rather than a direct use of the text.  I think I understand now why the Eastern Church got so bent out of shape over the Filioque.  Of course the section of John we hear on Divine Mercy Sunday seems to show the Spirit proceeding from the Son as well, but I will leave that one for the theologians.  May Christ complete the reunion of his Churches in East and West.

Gospel
Matthew 10:26-33

Lectionary:
Jesus said to the Twelve: “Fear no one.  Nothing is concealed that will not be revealed, nor secret that will not be known.  What I say to you in the darkness, speak in the light; what you hear whispered, proclaim on the housetops.  And do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather, be afraid of the one who can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna.  Are not two sparrows sold for a small coin?  Yet not one of them falls to the ground without your Father’s knowledge.  Even all the hairs of your head are counted.  So do not be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.  Everyone who acknowledges me before others I will acknowledge before my heavenly Father.  But whoever denies me before others, I will deny before my heavenly Father.”

1970/1986 NAB:
“Therefore do not be afraid of them.  Nothing is concealed that will not be revealed, nor secret that will not be known.  What I say to you in the darkness, speak in the light; what you hear whispered, proclaim on the housetops.  And do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather, be afraid of the one who can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna.  Are not two sparrows sold for a small coin?  Yet not one of them falls to the ground without your Father’s knowledge.  Even all the hairs of your head are counted.  So do not be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.  Everyone who acknowledges me before others I will acknowledge before my heavenly Father.  But whoever denies me before others, I will deny before my heavenly Father.”

The lectionary adds an incipit and changes the first sentence to remove the pronoun which lacks an antecedent once this passage is taken from its place in Matthew’s missionary discourse.  This is beautiful and clear, in my opinion.  Living this way, of course, is much harder than admiring the work of translation.
Communion antiphon (two choices)
Psalm 145:15

Lectionary (ICEL Translation):
The eyes of all look to you, Lord,
And you give them their food in due season

1970/1986 NAB:
The eyes of all look hopefully to you,
And you give them their food in due season

NABRE Psalter:
The eyes of all look hopefully to you;
You give them their food in due season.

Revised Grail Psalms:

The eyes of all look to you,
and you give them their food in due season.


John 10:11, 15

Lectionary (ICEL Translation):
I am the Good Shepherd,
And I lay down my life for my sheep, says the Lord

1970/1986 NAB:
I am the good shepherd...and I will lay down my life for the sheep


Just a bit of tinkering here.  Ho-hum.  Maybe next time I will ignore the antiphons and alleluia verse.