tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5272296692697032264.post2827528774987752153..comments2024-03-09T04:22:11.040-08:00Comments on Catholic Bibles: Catholic Bible Dictionary ReviewTimothyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12530713931306188305noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5272296692697032264.post-10928077992135870172009-06-29T14:17:58.422-07:002009-06-29T14:17:58.422-07:00Yeah, that was my mistake. Hopefully the edit wil...Yeah, that was my mistake. Hopefully the edit will make it clearer.Timothyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12530713931306188305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5272296692697032264.post-25288349210766972492009-06-29T14:15:40.710-07:002009-06-29T14:15:40.710-07:00I think that I put it behind the HarperCollins edi...I think that I put it behind the HarperCollins edition, but slightly better than the old McKenzie version. I will check on that. HarperCollins clearly has more info, including diagrams and photos.Timothyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12530713931306188305noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5272296692697032264.post-26868253003309165302009-06-29T13:29:08.817-07:002009-06-29T13:29:08.817-07:00I am surprised that you rank this ahead of the Har...I am surprised that you rank this ahead of the <i>HarperCollins Bible Dictionary</i> in terms of amount of material contained. Looking at the respective page layouts and page count, I would have come to the opposite conclusion.<br /><br />(Actually, it seems that the <i>Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible</i> appears to be the most compendious of all the single volume Bible dictionaries. I use the <i>Anchor Bible Dictionary</i>, but I also own the <i>Eerdmans</i> and recommend it to students.)Theophrastushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04981876713019298465noreply@blogger.com